Abstracts – Browse Results
Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 28 results ...
Babatunde, S O and Perera, S (2017) Cross-sectional comparison of public-private partnerships in transport infrastructure development in Nigeria. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 875-900.
Beitelmal, W, Molenaar, K R, Javernick-Will, A and Pellicer, E (2017) Challenges and barriers to establishing infrastructure asset management: A comparative study between Libya and the USA. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1184-202.
Caldas, C and Gupta, A (2017) Critical factors impacting the performance of mega-projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 920-34.
Chan, A P C, Wong, F K W, Hon, C K H, Ali, J A and Lyu, S (2017) Construction safety and health problems of ethnic minority workers in Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 901-19.
Dada, J O (2017) An appraisal of paradigm shifts required of competence of the Nigerian quantity surveyors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1269-80.
Damci, A, Arditi, D and Polat, G (2017) Civil engineers’ personal values/demographics linkage in project team building. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1337-49.
de Paula, N, Arditi, D and Melhado, S (2017) Managing sustainability efforts in building design, construction, consulting, and facility management firms. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1040-50.
Edirisinghe, R, London, K A, Kalutara, P and Aranda-Mena, G (2017) Building information modelling for facility management: Are we there yet?. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1119-54.
El-Hamrawy, S A-K, Abu El-Maaty, A E and Akal, A Y (2017) Proposed models to measure the quality of highway projects: Regression analysis vs statistical-fuzzy approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 988-1003.
Gledson, B J and Greenwood, D (2017) The adoption of 4D BIM in the UK construction industry: An innovation diffusion approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 950-67.
Hamzeh, F, Abdul, G O, Saleh, B M B and Abbas, Y (2017) Modular concrete construction: The differing perspectives of designers, manufacturers, and contractors in Lebanon. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 935-49.
Jaeger, M, Yu, G and Adair, D (2017) Organisational culture of Chinese construction organisations in Kuwait. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1051-66.
Koops, L, van Loenhout, C, Bosch-Rekveldt, M, Hertogh, M and Bakker, H (2017) Different perspectives of public project managers on project success. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1294-318.
Mosley Jr, J C and Bubshait, A A (2017) Project procurement systems for mechanical, electrical and piping projects in Saudi Arabia: An empirical assessment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1004-17.
Nikmehr, B, Hosseini, M R, Rameezdeen, R, Chileshe, N, Ghoddousi, P and Arashpour, M (2017) An integrated model for factors affecting construction and demolition waste management in Iran. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1246-68.
Osei-Kyei, R and Chan, A P C (2017) Empirical comparison of critical success factors for public-private partnerships in developing and developed countries: A case of Ghana and Hong Kong. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1222-45.
Ritson, N H, Wilson, M M J and Cohen, D A (2017) Managing engineering contractors in the UK petrochemicals industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1067-80.
Senaratne, S, Jin, X-H and Balasuriya, K (2017) Exploring the role of networks in disseminating construction project knowledge through case studies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1281-93.
Sepasgozar, S M E and Loosemore, M (2017) The role of customers and vendors in modern construction equipment technology diffusion. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1203-21.
Staykova, G and Underwood, J (2017) Assessing collaborative performance on construction projects through knowledge exchange: A UK rail strategic alliance case study. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 968-87.
Teo, A L E, Ofori, G, Tjandra, I and Kim, H (2017) Framework for productivity and safety enhancement system using BIM in Singapore. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1350-71.
- Type: Journal Article
- Keywords: productivity; BIM; safety; system
- ISBN/ISSN:
- URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2016-0122
- Abstract:
Purpose Despite recognition of its importance to Singapore’s economy, the construction industry is plagued by poor safety and productivity performance. Improvement efforts by the government and industry have yielded little results. The purpose of this paper is to propose a framework for developing a productivity and safety monitoring system using Building Information Modelling (BIM). Design/methodology/approach The framework, Intelligent Productivity and Safety System (IPASS), takes advantage of mandatory requirements for building plans to be submitted for approval in Singapore in BIM format. IPASS is based on a study comprising interviews and a questionnaire-based survey. It uses BIM to integrate buildable design, prevention and control of hazards, and safety assessment. Findings The authors illustrate a development of IPASS capable of generating productivity and safety scores for construction projects by analysing BIM model information. Research limitations/implications The paper demonstrates that BIM can be used to monitor productivity and safety as a project progresses, and help to enhance performance under the two parameters. Practical implications IPASS enables collaboration among project stakeholders as they can base their work on analysis of productivity and safety performance before projects start, and as they progress. It is suggested that the BIM model submitted to the authorities should be used for the IPASS application. Originality/value IPASS has rule-checking, hazards identification and quality checking capabilities. It is able to identify hazards and risks with the rule-checking capabilities. IPASS enables practitioners to check mistakes and the rationality of a design. It helps to mitigate risks as there are built-in safety measures/controls rules to overcome the problems caused by design deficiency, wrong-material-choice, and more.
Tran, D Q, Nguyen, L D and Faught, A (2017) Examination of communication processes in design-build project delivery in building construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1319-36.
Trigunarsyah, B (2017) Organizational culture influence on client involvement. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1155-69.
Venselaar, M and Wamelink, H (2017) The nature of qualitative construction partnering research: Literature review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1092-118.
Vu, H A, Cu, V H, Min, L X and Wang, J Q (2017) Risk analysis of schedule delays in international highway projects in Vietnam using a structural equation model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1018-39.
Wang, C, Li, B, Li, B and Baldwin, A (2017) Case study of “project controlling” on a large HOPSCA project in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 862-74.
Yu, A T W (2017) Using jigsaw method to enhance the learning of research and consultancy techniques for postgraduate students. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1081-91.
Yu, J, Ma, G and Jiang, X (2017) Impact of the built environment and care services within rural nursing homes in China on quality of life for elderly residents. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(06), 1170-83.